The Rising ‘Posh-Poor Divide’: The Way Affluence and Hardship Now Sit Cheek by Jowl in Across England.
Within a postwar estate known as ‘The Nunny’, residents live in properties just several yards from their more affluent counterparts in nearby Scartho village. A 1.8-metre-high barricade physically divides the two communities in the town of Grimsby, blocking off roads and walkways that previously connected them.
“This is the posh-poor divide,” said Serenity Colley, aged 37. “It has been there for as long as I’ve known. I don’t think they’ll take it down because I don’t think they’ll want to mix with us.”
An Increasingly Common Pattern Across the Country
Data from government statistics reveals how deep disparity often exists, sometimes across nothing more than a few metres of tarmac, a hedge row or a wall. Decades of budget cuts and lack of funding mean a majority of local authorities now have a neighbourhood classified as one of the poorest in the country.
This spread of deprivation has led to a significant rise in the quantity of places where disadvantaged and affluent people end up living side by side. In 2019, just 65 of the poorest areas adjoined one of the least deprived. This number increased to 119 in the most recent data.
A Barrier Which Divides More Than Land
At this Lincolnshire site, the divide is the most pronounced in the country and starkly obvious. The barrier transcends being just a metaphorical divide; it creates tangible difficulties for everyday life.
- The school commute that should take a quarter of an hour turn into an hour-long detour.
- Reaching important amenities like supermarkets, educational facilities and employment centres is made more difficult.
- The area often sees vandalism and loitering, with reports of rubbish being thrown over the wall and other problems.
“You try to maintain a nice house and nice garden, and then you live opposite that,” noted one local, motioning at the rusted barricade.
Local Bonds Against a Backdrop of Hardship
Within a local community centre, staff stress that need transcends postcodes. “Your postcode is not a reliable indicator of your level of challenge,” explained chief executive a community leader.
Regardless of being placed in the most deprived 10% for multiple deprivation indicators, the estate retains a fierce loyalty and sense of togetherness among its residents. By contrast, Scartho ranks among the most prosperous 10% overall.
Echoes Elsewhere: An Estate in Kent
This pattern is repeated across the country. The Stanhope area in Kent, a 1960s housing development, is in the most disadvantaged tenth of neighbourhoods in the country. It is closely bordered by large houses built in the early 2000s that are in the top 10% for employment and quality of surroundings.
“They may possess larger properties, but here there’s more community,” said Phil Hockley, 63. “You’ll probably find many people over there never even talk to each other.”
The economic gap is evident: an average family home sells for about £275,000 on the estate, while across the divide equivalent homes fetch about £410,000.
Residents speak of a tangible sense of being overlooked. “This part of the community gets ignored,” stated resident Susan. “In this area our facilities have gradually disappeared, and the majority of the issues we face here are related to poverty.”
The rise in these ‘inequality borders’ presents a portrait of an increasingly divided society, where prosperity and need are frequently uncomfortably in close proximity.